All methods have their specific advantages and disadvantages, depending on the
goals to be reached. In February 2002, we sent out a short description of our
project to the following companies, asking them to specify if their scanning
device or service would be appropriate for documenting small and large plaster
sculptures in Museum situations:
 3DD Digital Corp.,
Danbury, CT [Elisabeth Kaufmann, Satish Mysore]
3DTech
4DI, Automation-Online, Chelmsford,
MA, USA [Jim Atwood]
Chronosvision/Integrated Vision
Products, Germany/Sweden
Cyberware,
Monterey, California [Sue Addleman]
Immersion
Corp., (Microscribe) San José, CAL, USA
Kreon
Technologies, Limoges, France
Minolta 3D,
Langenhagen, Germany [Marco Zajac & Stefanie Adolf]]
Perceptron,
Plymouth, MI, USA
Polhemus
FastScan, Vermont, USA
Riegl - USA
[Jim van Rens]
RSI,
Oberursel, Germany (PhotoModeler, MicroScribe, Polhemus a.o.)
[Werner
Lenz]
Roland DGA
Corp., Irvina, CAL, USA
ShapeGrabber
Inc., Ottawa, Canada [Marc Bisson]
Steinbichler,
Traunstein, Germany
Wolf &
Beck, Wangen, Germany
|
