All methods have their specific advantages and disadvantages,
depending on the goals to be reached. In February 2002, we sent out
a short description of our project to the following companies,
asking them to specify if their scanning device or service would be
appropriate for documenting small and large plaster sculptures in
Museum situations:
3DD
Digital Corp., Danbury, CT [Elisabeth Kaufmann, Satish Mysore]
3DTech
4DI,
Automation-Online, Chelmsford, MA, USA [Jim Atwood]
Chronosvision/Integrated
Vision Products, Germany/Sweden
Cyberware,
Monterey, California [Sue Addleman]
Immersion
Corp., (Microscribe) San José, CAL, USA
Kreon
Technologies, Limoges, France
Minolta 3D,
Langenhagen, Germany [Marco Zajac & Stefanie Adolf]
Perceptron,
Plymouth, MI, USA
Polhemus
FastScan, Vermont, USA
Riegl - USA
[Jim van Rens]
RSI,
Oberursel, Germany (PhotoModeler, MicroScribe, Polhemus a.o.)
[Werner Lenz]
Roland DGA
Corp., Irvina, CAL, USA
ShapeGrabber
Inc., Ottawa, Canada [Marc Bisson]
Steinbichler,
Traunstein, Germany
Wolf &
Beck, Wangen, Germany
|